(+0.25)![]()
Analysis of the match between Ukraine and Sweden
Ukraine’s place in the play-off round is clearly a highly commendable achievement, especially considering the exceptional circumstances they have had to endure throughout the qualifying campaign. Due to the impact of the conflict with Russia, the team has been forced to play most of its matches at neutral venues, which has undoubtedly created significant disadvantages. In that context, Ukraine’s ability to remain competitive is a testament to their resilience and admirable fighting spirit. Even the two defeats they suffered are not something to be overly criticized for, as both losses came against France – currently one of the strongest national teams in the world.
In contrast to Ukraine’s determined and resilient image, Sweden have been one of the biggest disappointments in Group B of the European World Cup 2026 qualifiers. After six matches, the Nordic side failed to win a single game. Not only have they struggled badly in attack, scoring just four goals, but they have also exposed major defensive weaknesses by conceding as many as 12 times. Those numbers clearly show that Sweden are in serious decline and have yet to find a solution to their ongoing slump in form.
The managerial change, with the appointment of Graham Potter, has also failed to deliver the positive signs many had hoped for. In the former Chelsea manager’s very first match in charge, Sweden suffered a heavy 1-4 defeat to Switzerland. That result underlined the fact that the rebuilding process still has a long way to go, and at least for now, a change in leadership has not been enough to change the team’s fortunes.
With a better FIFA ranking (30th compared to 42nd), as well as far greater consistency and more convincing performances throughout the qualifiers, Ukraine have every reason to feel confident about their chances of victory. If they perform to their true level, the team in yellow should be fully capable of overcoming a Sweden side that still looks far from stable despite the recent managerial change.
